Certified Professional Public Buyer (CPPB) 2025 – 400 Free Practice Questions to Pass the Exam

Question: 1 / 625

When is a ‘brand name or approved equal’ specification most appropriate?

When quality is not a major concern

When there are standard features that must be met

A ‘brand name or approved equal’ specification is most appropriate when there are standard features that must be met. This type of specification allows for flexibility in the selection of products while ensuring that essential characteristics and qualities are maintained. By specifying a brand name or allowing for an equivalent, the buyer can outline necessary features or performance standards that all options must meet, thus protecting the integrity of the procurement process.

In situations where quality is not a major concern, a less restrictive approach might be suitable, focusing on cost rather than specific standards. If innovation is the primary focus, more open specifications that encourage new ideas and products may be preferable. Additionally, if compliance with legal standards is not needed, this might lead to choices that prioritize ease of procurement over the need for consistency and reliability that 'brand name or approved equal' specifications typically provide.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

When innovation is the primary focus

When compliance with legal standards is not needed

Next Question

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy